The best thing for us Biden's supporters is to ask Biden to tell T that he (T) has won the election. Then T will get four more years, attack China militarily, finish the CCP, and then Mr Siu and his supporters here will be soooo happy. You want T so badly? You can have him. Even though i voted for Biden, I don't mind. Only promise me that you will be happy afterwards, because I suspect you will still be unhappy, and you will still be blaming us.
Uyi Ma个月 前
世界之最醜的選舉,表露人性的醜陋。👎👎👎
edmond choi个月 前
不是陰謀,是陽謀
David Siu个月 前
如果 JAN 20/2021 B. OBAMA 就会出动海豹部队来搬走特老头,放心啦老糊涂
David Siu个月 前
其实 D TRUMP 已经帮了中国一个忙。 如果没有 TRUMP 香港出品的东西就不会 是 MAKE IN CHINA 奇怪的是今次假民主党有不敢出来搞示威和破坏 ??
SHOULD WE COUNT ON THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF HONG KONG TO SAFEGUARD THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE IN HONG KONG? Please refer to the Google Groups (網路論壇) including "Lee Tai Building in Hong Kong" and "Lee Tai Building b" for details relating to the matters mentioned below, so that you can answer the question above. CONFIDENTIAL AND URGENT! 牛頭不對馬嘴! (牛頭唔搭馬嘴!) The Buildings Department has violated Article 64 of the Basic Law and subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 Buildings Ordinance etc.. Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, fail to execute their powers and duties as per Article 73 of the Basic Law. Please respond to my e-mails sent to you before the Legislative Councillors of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong leave the Legislative Council in December of 2020. From: **, an owner of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 太子道西101-107號利泰大樓業主 To: The Legislative Council of the HKSAR, the Public Complaints Office and all Legislative Council Members To: The Development Bureau of the HKSAR, The Buildings Department, The Fire Services Department, The Food and Health Bureau, FEHD) To: The Democratic Party of Hong Kong and WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Council Member Attn.: James TO Kun-sun, Mr. LAM Cheuk Ting and Mr. Chan, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan ............................. Dear All, Complaints about the Unauthorized Use of the Public/Common Areas at Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong by the Owner/Tenant of G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building [檔案編號:2-4933763902 (assigned by 1823)] [檔案編號:EP3/K03/RE/00034760-18 (assigned by EPD)] The case number assigned by The Ombudsman is OMB2019/1791. Complaints against the Buildings Department Complaints against Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun and Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong With respect to the content of the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, with reference no.: EB/5120/61/T02N, a copy of which is attached to this e-mail, my responses are as follows: It is reasonable for us to expect that the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong mentioned above is for responding to the relevant questions/issues in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department of Hong Kong. Clearly, the main focuses of the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from Mr. WU Chi-wai of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong to the Buildings Department mentioned above are the relevant aspects of subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 Buildings Ordinance of the Laws of Hong Kong, and therefore the Buildings Department of Hong Kong must respond to the questions/issues stated in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from Mr. WU Chi-wai of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong mentioned above specifically for the relevant aspects of subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong as per Article 64 of the Basic Law, which is as follows: www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html Article 64 of the Basic Law: The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must abide by the law and be accountable to the Legislative Council of the Region: ........ it shall answer questions raised by members of the Council; ......... As all people in Hong Kong must understand the Basic Law and the laws of Hong Kong etc., both the staff of the Buildings Department and the Legislative Council members must understand the Basic Law and the laws of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong ( www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001 ) and the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 Building Management Ordinance ( www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344 ) etc.. Clearly, for reasons mentioned in this email and/or mentioned before in my previous e-mails, the Buildings Department has been violating the laws of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong and Article 64 of the Basic Law etc.. .......... However, I would summarize my complaints against the Buildings Department as follows: 1. For reasons mentioned before and/or in this e-mail, the Buildings Department has been failing to execute its duties as per the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 123 including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 and/or other relevant sections/subsections of the Laws of Hong Kong, partly because the Buildings Department is not willing to check whether the owner of the G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building had obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building for converting the common parts of Lee Tai Building for its own use in the way mentioned in the e-mails/documents relating to the complaints stated above as per the literal interpretation of subsection no. 16(1)(d) of Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance. The Buildings Department must fully understand the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 Building Management Ordinance of the Laws of Hong Kong including section 18 and section 34I etc. of CAP 344 of the Laws of Hong Kong. If the staff of the Buildings Department do not fully understand such relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 of the Laws of Hong Kong, they would not be able to correctly identify and/or communicate with the wrongdoers relating to unauthorized buildings works. www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344?xpid=ID_1438403038456_002 2. The Buildings Department has failed to properly respond to my e-mails and/or the relevant correspondence from Mr. WU Chi-wai/the Democratic Party of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, ........ As I have expressed in my previous e-mails to you, the responses of the Buildings Department with respect to the captioned complaints are evasive, inadequate and misleading. The Buildings Department has not yet properly mentioned/stated anything with respect to the interpretation and/or execution of subsection no. 16(1)(d) of Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance and/or other relevant provisions of the laws of Hong Kong. 牛頭不對馬嘴! (牛頭唔搭馬嘴!) As such, the Buildings Department has not yet answered the questions in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department and the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) is meaningless. Therefore, the Buildings Department has violated Article 64 of the Basic Law. ................ However, I would summarize my complaints against the Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong including Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) etc. and/or the Democratic Party of Hong Kong as follows: a. For reasons mentioned before in my previous e-mails and/or in this e-mail, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) fail to execute their powers and duties as per Article 73 of the Basic Law in the ways mentioned in my previous e-mails ............... www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html Article 73 of the Basic Law is as follows: The Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall exercise the following powers and functions: ................................. ( 5 ) To raise questions on the work of the government; ( 6 ) To debate any issue concerning public interests; ................................... ( 8 ) To receive and handle complaints from Hong Kong residents; ............................................... ( 10 ) To summon, as required when exercising the above-mentioned powers and functions, persons concerned to testify or give evidence. Particularly, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) have failed to execute their powers and duties as per sections/subsections 5, 6, 8 and 10 etc. of Article 73 of the Basic Law, partly because they have not yet summoned 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) to testify or give evidence as per Article 73 of the Basic Law with respect to the complaints stated above and or before in my previous e-mails sent to you and ask 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) the following question(s): "Has 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building as per Cap 344 Building Management Ordinance for converting the relevant common parts of Lee Tai Building in the way mentioned before for its own use? If so, 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) is to provide all the relevant evidence(s) as per Article 73 of the Basic Law." Moreover, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) has been failing to compel/urge the Buildings Department to properly respond to my e-mails and/or......... I hereby urge you to execute your duties mentioned above and/or before properly and immediately .............. before the Legislative Councillors of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong leave the Legislative Council in December of 2020.
如果證明選與公證, 會唔會有人輸得心服口服呢? 如果證實無大量舞弊, Trump would be doing the country a big disservice and shame all Americans with all the divisive rhetoric!!
Fair。 Truth。个月 前
第二張像是打壓川普 cnpost.info/down/aW7I0dGMn9-Sybs/sh-p-n.html What's this ? produced on 1995 ?? (Hope lucky with us always)...……
Joseph Kwok个月 前
Thanks info sharing
kobe blue个月 前
China is the happiest team to see the democracy of USA trading down this way. God save USA.
Spock个月 前
Democracy system is more fragile than we would like to admit.
Spock个月 前
Agreed and Russia too. The US is totally divided. Both side has the mind set of ""you're either with us, or against us" .
Moon Tien个月 前
輸家還不接受到自己輸了!🤡
Myron Yu个月 前
You are talking about Biden right? Yes Biden should excused himself to run 2020 Presidency.
Spock个月 前
Mr. S, I thought you say Democratic fixed the software of dominion voting system by changing the vote from Trump to Biden, if that is the case, why they still fixing the paper ballots manually.
Spock个月 前
Mr. S, how come the Trump administration say nothing and did nothing on Joshua Wong taken into custody. Why nothing from Trump?
周庭被捕,黃婆婆被捕,議員被捕,香港的司法制度,經過英國150年的栽培,今日全部付諸流水,非但香港的法庭,好似粵語殘片啲法庭一樣,任由班貪官污吏,隨便搬龍門,今日,連美國的司法制度,都好像全盤價值,一筆勾銷。 心底下其實真的很憤怒。 憤怒?這種憤怒,令我想起 1957年的一套電影,叫做『12怒漢』,96分鐘長的黑白片,演員的英語,字正腔圓,沒有字幕也可以聽得明白。他是我們成長期的價值觀,我們牢牢地緊記着這套價值觀,一生的奮鬥,都是在維護這一套價值觀。 我可以了解班山寨共產黨未接觸過這種價值觀。 但看今日的美國,連美國人都開始脫離了這一套價值觀,那麼美國還有什麼價值呢? 我們一向所信賴的,就是... 人生就是為了創造價值,尤其是把已經存有的價值,令他百尺竿頭更進一步。但在今日人肉橫流,紙醉金迷的社會裏面,我們在養老院裏面,可以呼籲全美國每一個人都看一次這套電影嗎? 可以呼籲全香港的人都看一次這套電影嗎? 可以呼籲特朗普把它買了回來,免費波給他的人民參考嗎?南嘸阿彌陀佛。 Agnes Chow was arrested, Grandma Wong was arrested, members of the legislature were arrested, Hong Kong’s judicial system, after 150 years of cultivation by the British, is all in the garbage can. Not only Hong Kong’s courts are just like vintage Cantonese judicial courts, always operated by corrupt officials who are capable and willing to twist reality to any shapes they like, today, even the American judicial system seems to be completely wiped out. I am angry. Angry? “Anger” reminds me of a 1957 movie called "12 Angry Men", a 96-minute black and white film, in which the actors spoke perfectly pronounced English words which you can understand without subtitles. The movie is about the value of our growing up era. We keep this set of values firmly in mind, and we have maintained this set of values in our life's struggle. I can understand that the fake Communist Party has never been exposed to such values. But looking at the United States today, even Americans have begun to break away from this set of values, so what value does the United States have now? We have always believed that... Life is to create value. And for the values that already exist, to make them more valuable. But in today’s society, in which the roaring river of our desires flooded out of control, those of us in nursing homes, can we call everyone in the United States to watch this movie once? Can we call everyone in Hong Kong to watch this movie once? Can we ask Trump to buy the movie right and let all his people watch it free? Nanya Amitabha. www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-55039969 #CIA, #MI6, #CSIS, #ASIS, #DGSE, #RAW, #BND, #SVR, #Mossad
I used to watch the American Alpabet Channels news liked ABC/CBS/NBC and CNN but it all changed after I realized that they are all biased in not reporting Joe Biden and Hunter Biden Scandal and Corruption , the real news are from Siu Channel, Newsmax ,Next news channel, Epoch Time , Right side news broadcast , and NTD.....God bless America , Hong Kong and Taiwan !
But according to Mr. S, it was only 33% then yesterday.....5%........then......x.xx% I wonder how he got those percentage. How that formula create that 33% and 5% ?
Marcus Chan个月 前
This guy is talking rubbish!
Spock个月 前
Agreed but according to Mr. S, it was first 33% then yesterday.....5%........then......x.xx% I wonder how he got those percentage. How that "scientific" formula create that 33% and 5% ?
After the 3rd of November election night, I lost even the last bit of confidence in American democracy. This country just turned into a banana republic and history will tell it has already passed its prime and heading south.
peter yeung个月 前
Give yourself a chance. There's hope. Be patient and the truth will prevail.
So much delayed for this news??? why Mr. Shiu had the last show first if he is updated??? This should be the major news of the day! I suggest Mr. Shiu does his homework first before he talks!