(中字)球王馬勒當拿逝世終年60歲 佔旺畫家向警總擲雞蛋判囚21個月 胡法光之子作證周星馳〈蕭若元:蕭氏新聞台〉2020-11-26

  意见 159,684

memehongkong

个月 前

我開左Twitter和IG啦!想睇多d可以關注:Twitter: @hkStephenSYY / IG: hkStephenSYY
加入我們的patreon:www.patreon.com/mrshiu
你爆料我來講email: connectiontaiwan@gmail.com
謎米新聞:news.memehk.com
謎米香港: www.memehk.com
Facebook: memehkdotcom

评论
siumai Nie
siumai Nie 27 天 前
支持蕭若元!
SuperGavin1230
SuperGavin1230 个月 前
燈神
KWOK LEUNG LI
KWOK LEUNG LI 个月 前
每人派1億 1年後做完美世界天上之國 completeheaven.net
Lina Jian
Lina Jian 个月 前
我生活过澳門几年,在加拿大生活了许多年。见到了许多香港人的犀利,自以为是天下最聪明的人!如今如此的遭遇,应该好好反省。骄傲和不义社會會带来灾难的
Lina Jian
Lina Jian 个月 前
你不能以他的才能而轻看他的自私,不尊重另一方
Lina Jian
Lina Jian 个月 前
Sorry missed front part我講的是你提及的周星驰
Lina Jian
Lina Jian 个月 前
利用她的利力,你们的香港人应该有公义的心来談論此事
andy man
andy man 个月 前
馬拉當那球技了得,人品低下,吸毒浪荡,思想左倾,与独裁者卡斯特罗,查维斯等关糸密切,把卡斯特罗像刺青在腿上,公开黑美国和川普至极,扬言不能再容忍川普四年,上帝之手及时将他帶离人间,阿门,🙏
Sampson Chan
Sampson Chan 个月 前
合約精神建基於(consideration ), 不是remuneration
Shing Yee Yeung
Shing Yee Yeung 个月 前
老蕭,你的私人生活網民係無權理,絕對私穩,毋需向網友解釋。加油。👍👍
kwok leung
kwok leung 个月 前
我就不贊同蕭生睇法,那個姓周啲影好低級!
出售各种刀剑冷兵器加微信bww445
出售各种刀剑冷兵器加微信bww445 个月 前
明白事理的人使自己适应世界,不明事理的人硬想使世界适应自己。
Mita ku
Mita ku 个月 前
冇人識佢㗎喇, 係老餅先記得佢嘅啫
Super X
Super X 个月 前
i would say Chow has a small cult following outside of HK and China. but hes really not that popular outside of Asia. even in Asia ( excluding HK and China) he still isnt that big. but Bruce lee on the hand, hes being worshipped with a huge impact on popular culture whether western cinema, video games, anime, every thing. really, in terms of influence and popularity. Chow is legendary but only restricted to China and Hong Kong. hes at best our hero but not world wide like Bruce Lee
Rico So
Rico So 个月 前
向警總掟雞蛋判21個月,但在沙田向示威者揮舞長刀的女子卻只判3個月,無語。
Yolanda Choi
Yolanda Choi 个月 前
口頭話要娶你,就係一定要結婚?
广东人VIP女
广东人VIP女 个月 前
他死得太早太可惜,平时生活不良习惯害死他。
guohui zhou
guohui zhou 个月 前
就系因为你讲马勒当拿我俾个赞你
L Wong
L Wong 个月 前
Hi
mimi hello
mimi hello 个月 前
無錯~~當成就太早期完成~縮短成長期~~好難再去搵特破位~~這美劇~~剛好開始睇到一半~~內容精彩,期待下半發展~~勵志片~推薦~大家睇~~謝謝燒山~
Kwok Cheung Kai
Kwok Cheung Kai 个月 前
不倫什麼人,守信用是基本常識吧!
小學雞習豬頭
小學雞習豬頭 个月 前
千古罪人《林鄭月娥》
Dick Yan
Dick Yan 个月 前
你冇講白小姐,但你的書有提何重華喎
ERIK L
ERIK L 个月 前
21個月, 太少了. ...
Kev C.
Kev C. 个月 前
吸毒饮酒鸠食,60岁算长命
William Yan
William Yan 个月 前
審死官卜街啪 扺死
Paul Lee
Paul Lee 个月 前
唔知幾時連beyond 既大地都不能唱呢? .... 神秘的中央....
Simon Wong
Simon Wong 个月 前
上帝之手球王。
leetai hk
leetai hk 个月 前
SHOULD WE COUNT ON THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF HONG KONG TO SAFEGUARD THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE IN HONG KONG? Please refer to the Google Groups (網路論壇) including "Lee Tai Building in Hong Kong" and "Lee Tai Building b" for details relating to the matters mentioned below, so that you can answer the question above. CONFIDENTIAL AND URGENT! 牛頭不對馬嘴! (牛頭唔搭馬嘴!) The Buildings Department has violated Article 64 of the Basic Law and subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 Buildings Ordinance etc.. Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, fail to execute their powers and duties as per Article 73 of the Basic Law. Please respond to my e-mails sent to you before the Legislative Councillors of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong leave the Legislative Council in December of 2020. From: **, an owner of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 太子道西101-107號利泰大樓業主 To: The Legislative Council of the HKSAR, the Public Complaints Office and all Legislative Council Members To: The Development Bureau of the HKSAR, The Buildings Department, The Fire Services Department, The Food and Health Bureau, FEHD) To: The Democratic Party of Hong Kong and WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Council Member Attn.: James TO Kun-sun, Mr. LAM Cheuk Ting and Mr. Chan, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan ............................. Dear All, Complaints about the Unauthorized Use of the Public/Common Areas at Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong by the Owner/Tenant of G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building [檔案編號:2-4933763902 (assigned by 1823)] [檔案編號:EP3/K03/RE/00034760-18 (assigned by EPD)] The case number assigned by The Ombudsman is OMB2019/1791. Complaints against the Buildings Department Complaints against Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun and Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong With respect to the content of the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, with reference no.: EB/5120/61/T02N, a copy of which is attached to this e-mail, my responses are as follows: It is reasonable for us to expect that the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong mentioned above is for responding to the relevant questions/issues in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department of Hong Kong. Clearly, the main focuses of the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from Mr. WU Chi-wai of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong to the Buildings Department mentioned above are the relevant aspects of subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 Buildings Ordinance of the Laws of Hong Kong, and therefore the Buildings Department of Hong Kong must respond to the questions/issues stated in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from Mr. WU Chi-wai of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong mentioned above specifically for the relevant aspects of subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong as per Article 64 of the Basic Law, which is as follows: www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html Article 64 of the Basic Law: The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must abide by the law and be accountable to the Legislative Council of the Region: ........ it shall answer questions raised by members of the Council; ......... As all people in Hong Kong must understand the Basic Law and the laws of Hong Kong etc., both the staff of the Buildings Department and the Legislative Council members must understand the Basic Law and the laws of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong ( www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001 ) and the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 Building Management Ordinance ( www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344 ) etc.. Clearly, for reasons mentioned in this email and/or mentioned before in my previous e-mails, the Buildings Department has been violating the laws of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong and Article 64 of the Basic Law etc.. .......... However, I would summarize my complaints against the Buildings Department as follows: 1. For reasons mentioned before and/or in this e-mail, the Buildings Department has been failing to execute its duties as per the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 123 including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 and/or other relevant sections/subsections of the Laws of Hong Kong, partly because the Buildings Department is not willing to check whether the owner of the G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building had obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building for converting the common parts of Lee Tai Building for its own use in the way mentioned in the e-mails/documents relating to the complaints stated above as per the literal interpretation of subsection no. 16(1)(d) of Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance. The Buildings Department must fully understand the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 Building Management Ordinance of the Laws of Hong Kong including section 18 and section 34I etc. of CAP 344 of the Laws of Hong Kong. If the staff of the Buildings Department do not fully understand such relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 of the Laws of Hong Kong, they would not be able to correctly identify and/or communicate with the wrongdoers relating to unauthorized buildings works. www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344?xpid=ID_1438403038456_002 2. The Buildings Department has failed to properly respond to my e-mails and/or the relevant correspondence from Mr. WU Chi-wai/the Democratic Party of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, ........ As I have expressed in my previous e-mails to you, the responses of the Buildings Department with respect to the captioned complaints are evasive, inadequate and misleading. The Buildings Department has not yet properly mentioned/stated anything with respect to the interpretation and/or execution of subsection no. 16(1)(d) of Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance and/or other relevant provisions of the laws of Hong Kong. 牛頭不對馬嘴! (牛頭唔搭馬嘴!) As such, the Buildings Department has not yet answered the questions in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department and the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) is meaningless. Therefore, the Buildings Department has violated Article 64 of the Basic Law. ................ However, I would summarize my complaints against the Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong including Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) etc. and/or the Democratic Party of Hong Kong as follows: a. For reasons mentioned before in my previous e-mails and/or in this e-mail, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) fail to execute their powers and duties as per Article 73 of the Basic Law in the ways mentioned in my previous e-mails ............... www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html Article 73 of the Basic Law is as follows: The Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall exercise the following powers and functions: ................................. ( 5 ) To raise questions on the work of the government; ( 6 ) To debate any issue concerning public interests; ................................... ( 8 ) To receive and handle complaints from Hong Kong residents; ............................................... ( 10 ) To summon, as required when exercising the above-mentioned powers and functions, persons concerned to testify or give evidence. Particularly, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) have failed to execute their powers and duties as per sections/subsections 5, 6, 8 and 10 etc. of Article 73 of the Basic Law, partly because they have not yet summoned 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) to testify or give evidence as per Article 73 of the Basic Law with respect to the complaints stated above and or before in my previous e-mails sent to you and ask 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) the following question(s): "Has 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building as per Cap 344 Building Management Ordinance for converting the relevant common parts of Lee Tai Building in the way mentioned before for its own use? If so, 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) is to provide all the relevant evidence(s) as per Article 73 of the Basic Law." Moreover, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) has been failing to compel/urge the Buildings Department to properly respond to my e-mails and/or......... I hereby urge you to execute your duties mentioned above and/or before properly and immediately .............. before the Legislative Councillors of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong leave the Legislative Council in December of 2020.
Waves Waves
Waves Waves 个月 前
I don't appreciate 無離頭 comedies
Lui Cheung
Lui Cheung 个月 前
馬勒當拿係好波,不過品德就唔及得比利啦。
Rose T
Rose T 个月 前
林奠=暴君
Rose T
Rose T 个月 前
老蕭講足球 👍
Tony Lee
Tony Lee 个月 前
周 鬆弛 係喜劇天才 ,無奈佢嘅本性喺一個 刻薄成性,爱搵人著數嘅賤人, 呢一點百分百 無需爭拗。
il38694
il38694 个月 前
雨傘都係武器啦!HK人以後買餸都要小心!
Kanlex kanlex
Kanlex kanlex 个月 前
Good job s
Andy
Andy 个月 前
週已經過氣,雖有藝術成就。
連 儂 牆 -連 儂 牆
連 儂 牆 -連 儂 牆 个月 前
特朗普領先... 最新重點票結果 11月15日 特朗普 232 票 ,拜登 227 票。堅持消滅共產黨 ... 十 一 開戰中,中共操政媒,拜共盗政變,華爾街變政,主媒陷投共, 支持合法特;全球齊減共 ,打倒教宗共 。😈共匪亡 中國興 😇 cnpost.info/down/dXusrbF0oJe_mqc/sh-p-n.html //關係全香港人既重要(你有需要睇哂) 這晚開始全個Facebook 都係洗版式既開香檳慶祝post,但就好似完全無人/無page講 「港康碼」 港康碼即係之前提過既健康碼,正如之前所講既一樣,政府會係兩個星期後落實,為係香港市民做DNA檢疫(非強制),之後會為已做檢疫既市民發出一個二維碼以分別健康情況// -網友 --------------------- 首先,抽DNA同而家防疫係完全零關係,零幫助,零作用,只為偷取大家既DNA。 第二,兩星期後,愛國愛黨同一大班藍絲就會去做檢疫,好可能有一班黃絲/中立人士都會不知情咁做左,當已檢疫人士達到一定數目,政府就會對持有健康碼既人士放寬防疫守則,健康碼顯示健康既人士可以自由進出食肆、唔洗限聚等等等等。 第三,當大家而家已經習慣去唔同地方都要比人用槍嘟頭既時候,遲下就唔係嘟頭而係出示健康碼,慢慢會有更多人唔係迫唔洗強制既情況下都會去做DNA檢疫,為既都係方便同埋覺得佢拎你DNA無乜大不了 (用於日後活摘...???) 第四,當健康碼普遍實行之後,政府會推出更加相應措施同設備去限制及監管大家,例如係交通工具,食肆,商場,公共設施,隧道或出入境 加裝健康碼掃描器,到時佢依然唔會強制逼你做檢疫,因為只要你無健康碼,就同禁足無分別,而且你去邊都要掃健康碼,佢間接對大家既行蹤一清二楚 第五,而家政府做任何野,相信大家都唔會相信,咁健康碼到底要點先證明你係健康呢? 大概就係分 著綠燈就健康,紅燈就唔健康 咁上下喇,即係大家健唔健康(有無得出門)都掌握係政府手,咁大家覺得佢會唔會用呢個方法間接管控大家,執行一切政治任務?例如社會肅清,監控輿論。只要大家講咩光復香港,五大訴求,香港獨立之類既說話,你或者你既屋企人既健康碼就有可能無端端由綠色變紅色,久而久之,大家就會知道講咩會變紅色,被禁足禁自由,慢慢社會上就再唔會有反政府聲音出現! 可能你覺得好on9,諗到咁極端,sorry,事實就係咁,呢一套社會信用系統,健康碼,已經係中國大陸實行緊,而上面講既,亦都係活生生既例子。// #手動轉 勇敢國民棄共黨 人權自由生永享 4 9 建國 7 1 滅 國際覺醒中共亡 做個勇敢中國人,堅持滅犯罪集團;做個勇敢中國人,堅持絕非法組織;做個勇敢中國人,堅持打倒共產黨;做個勇敢中國人,世代民主活自由。國際支援,機會不再;白黑珍惜,天佑香港...............
Andy
Andy 个月 前
其實好多餘。週星馳真係孤寒兼度縮。
花鸟字画法汉字
花鸟字画法汉字 个月 前
应是“自古美人如名--将’”?
凍奶茶
凍奶茶 个月 前
😱你真係食過白才女?
掂works
掂works 个月 前
拍過拖,好出奇咩
clyekcnu
clyekcnu 个月 前
你有講過白姐姐錄低同邊個女作家講電話的內容
Wai Yung Chu
Wai Yung Chu 个月 前
完全唔合理,雞蛋有幾大傷害,你地差佬整盲記者眼,要應該判死型。
白毛強
白毛強 个月 前
小心白韻琴又會叫你同老婆離婚
Rock The
Rock The 个月 前
掟雞蛋判21個月,原因並不是因為掟雞蛋呢個行為,系因為他掟的系警察總部...就等於在中共國如果你鬧其他人都唔會被判重罪,但如果鬧得系【習維尼】就撲街咯,唔信?睇下任志強就明白啦😄
Rock The
Rock The 个月 前
@angel chau 閣下可以去試試
姓善名忙
姓善名忙 个月 前
Stephen Chow did not pay remuneration to Yu but money or money s worth
Candy Ng
Candy Ng 个月 前
萧生以前既女朋友好似系叶德娴+白韵琴
Cat Cat Go
Cat Cat Go 个月 前
蕭生你幫YC我能理解,但不能歪曲事實,作為區議員在自己Facebook 發放錯誤訊息,抹黑警隊,不能將責任推到助理身上,浪費警力是因為警方要翻查所有紀錄發覺根本沒有拘捕過佢,警方之後拘捕他是浪費警力,他道歉是被捕之後,時間証明他沒有歉意,犯官非是咎由自取!
Kit Kwan
Kit Kwan 个月 前
蕭生,是consideration.
kasper NG
kasper NG 个月 前
球王做完腦手術後2~3星期瓜咗??? 唔係染咗武X肺卦???
Pat Kong
Pat Kong 个月 前
Try Hư
choi wan, johnny chong
choi wan, johnny chong 个月 前
兩人分手的原因,更是讓人大吃一驚。據知情人稱,周星馳的母親並不喜歡於文鳳。兩人談戀愛期間,「婆媳」關係鬧得很僵,對於於文鳳而言,13年的感情必然是放不下的。可架不住周星馳的媽媽搗亂,最終,周星馳卻再也沒有傳出新的戀情,直到滿頭白髮,依然孤身一人。 原文網址:71a.xyz/w27nbW
TubeYourTubeYour
TubeYourTubeYour 个月 前
我記得菱電嘅老細叫胡明亮!
mau wah tsang
mau wah tsang 个月 前
周星馳只有一六六左右但成就非常高
飯米
飯米 个月 前
🙏🙏🙏天主守護善良子民👨‍🎨🙇‍♂️🙏🙏🙏
Simon Ip
Simon Ip 个月 前
放長雙眼,上天要鹅亡,必先要佢瘋狂。
Caren Tsoi
Caren Tsoi 个月 前
真係好唔想再聽到呢個死街
kch
kch 个月 前
簽咗嘅嘢仲要抝,拍緊喜劇乎
Li Mark
Li Mark 个月 前
呢個官又會升官發財了!😡😡😡
Li Mark
Li Mark 个月 前
多謝分析!
Léon Léon
Léon Léon 个月 前
你宜家提白小姐囉,燈神⋯⋯😹👻
Wong Zood
Wong Zood 个月 前
😂😂😂剎人都係坐十年
邱不群
邱不群 个月 前
Cls
yy y
yy y 个月 前
老萧你要做一期 “李毅”这样可以高级黑
Sx0 Lx0
Sx0 Lx0 个月 前
I hate to break it to you. Stephen Chow's comedy's calibre is only at the regional level but no quite at world class level, he is definitely not Bruce Lee of the comedy, not even close. Everyone knows Bruce Lee, no one really know the name "Stephen Chow".
mars Wat
mars Wat 个月 前
香港之所以冇得救,就係時至今日,還去討論法理,公義。真係搞笑。
Vincent Lee
Vincent Lee 个月 前
燒山,在占基利面前,周腥腥算老幾?
Jimmy 797
Jimmy 797 个月 前
而佢顯然並不知道有Benny Hill(不文山)。
daniel chan
daniel chan 个月 前
馬勒當拿茅波王,打茅波以上帝之手,掩蓋是非,還受球壇接受,取世界冠軍,眾人無恥,以為好波,就可以有權有勢,胡作非為,放縱生活,行為不檢,早死早著,人性何其醜陋!
T lai
T lai 个月 前
天才都要讀書嘅!
lkfk1523
lkfk1523 个月 前
星爺大把錢,唔至在啦⋯⋯😂
Isaac Ko
Isaac Ko 个月 前
林鄭填命。
yui chiu lui
yui chiu lui 个月 前
開香檳,爆爆爆,開關免檢疫,衝衝衝,中招有錢派,中中中
Wong Apple
Wong Apple 个月 前
雞蛋案,可否就刑期上訴?蕭生忘記咗自己話大學時,媾咗W小姐。
汤智斌
汤智斌 个月 前
喂,你讲D唔讲D,咁白小姐到底点?讲D离听下🤣
lee martin
lee martin 个月 前
cnpost.info/down/frCqxZaqgcmY0tE/sh-p-n.html
伊藤瞳
伊藤瞳 个月 前
咁你點評價成龍?
刘福生
刘福生 个月 前
天才性恪總會有缺陷,失去人生最寶貴的人生價值觀,平果創辦人也是性格非常冷漠孤僻,對親人戀人兒女完全亳無感情,天生自私极端的,不过他们总是很勤劳的,不怕辛苦和艰辛用一生時間付出一切。為自己的目标奋斗而努力,实现自己的梦想,就是他的人生唯一。
Linus Yap
Linus Yap 个月 前
👍👍👍
tim cheung
tim cheung 个月 前
👍
伊藤瞳
伊藤瞳 个月 前
睇人,阿根廷巴西多這種生活亂球星,歐洲都有,但系相對少,我覺得同國家經濟有關,以前好多球星都響平民窟出黎
Honor 20lite
Honor 20lite 个月 前
💯💯💯💯❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🥰🥰🥰💪💪✌️
Iris lau
Iris lau 个月 前
黑警公報私仇,已經走火入魔
十山
十山 个月 前
星爺心裏想,我常常晚上幾億幾億咁過比你,你依家追我幾仟萬?有冇攪錯。
Tommy Cheng
Tommy Cheng 个月 前
Offer, acceptance and consideration
chris chan
chris chan 个月 前
又係consideration既問題
gala sung
gala sung 个月 前
香港的司法及法庭咁離譜,香港人可以點申訴呢?
刘湧
刘湧 个月 前
永遠の⚽️👑
eddie tran
eddie tran 个月 前
thank you for your support
M S
M S 个月 前
華燈夜總會算唔算上流舞場?
一根稻草
一根稻草 个月 前
男人基本法:可以得罪杂种,不能🉐️罪太太。
David Lin
David Lin 个月 前
周星驰案件是指他对于文鳯的承诺是否属實,是不是個渣男? 与他的藝術成就有幾高,亦完全無关。。
William海
William海 个月 前
萧生太喜欢周,如果是成龙,他就不会这样说了
調理勞務蘭花系
調理勞務蘭花系 个月 前
白小姐🤯
M S
M S 个月 前
DLLM 扔雞蛋有機會導致宇宙崩潰,毀消銀河系!
Jimmy 797
Jimmy 797 个月 前
李小龍係美國人喎。
YEE MAN CHAN
YEE MAN CHAN 个月 前
蕭生,咁 許冠文 的 喜劇又如何 ?前輩 鄧寄塵 ?梁醒波 ?鄭君綿 ?... 又如何 ?
j c
j c 个月 前
因為只有周星馳拍過老燒啲戲
valiant9394
valiant9394 个月 前
有冇人記得佢點樣得罪左蕭太呀?
A Inv
A Inv 个月 前
只不過是口言其心. 直咗少少啫!
Jimmy 797
Jimmy 797 个月 前
把狗提升到老婆的高度啫
Bill W
Bill W 个月 前
少年得志的球王,大器晚成的星爺,不過星爺已江郎才盡,所以有錢都唔敢駛
正論真言
正論真言 个月 前
投雞蛋判21個月,投石頭判終生嗎,死物比人權更重要,法理何在!
正論真言
正論真言 个月 前
@Jimmy 797 當差正趴街!
正論真言
正論真言 个月 前
@Jimmy 797 拳如雨下的黑警,有OT,有高薪,又拿抗爭者去出氣,誰能與他們爭鋒!
Jimmy 797
Jimmy 797 个月 前
100元一拳,拳如雨下,應該點計?
Yung Lucky
Yung Lucky 个月 前
上海人真係睇錢重,龔如心和家公就贍養費的官司,周星馳又係為呢D嘢上公堂,又唔係一夜夫妻百二蚊,何必呢?何苦呢?
鑫鑫黃
鑫鑫黃 个月 前
擺明想屈番多少X水費?
文化樹下:黃霑・好中國
52:11
RTHK 香港電台
意见 1.7M
我的迷信女友
4:43
FHProductionHK
意见 114K