支持蕭若元！

老蕭:插播搶收視·反效果使人痛駡你無知下流討厭······知否?

你又估，估親都錯！

他們在外国可用支付宝。咁就不會流失外匯啦!

下次用marker 筆呀

终共嚴禁國民及高，低官員出境，是要那班人在國內做人質是最大原因，因戰爭時邮班人是肉盾

～～～

絶大部分黨員都愛黨，唔會出逃！

咁雙馬的passport 都收？

正扑街成日系度呃流量呃关注, 出面疫情甘犀利如果吾甘样控制甘点做阿, 你甘叻你吾好厘系台湾啦去美国去欧洲行下啦, 成日甘多吾等驶口水正扑街.

少左chi na 人成個世界清静哂😁

大陸鎖國對其他國家有益，起碼不會造成傷害別人的周圍環境．

支持内地封關防疫，最佳政策，林郑必須仿效，學足。

决策英明，支持！

支持！防疫是佳政策。香港應仿效，林郑學足喇，万無一失。擁護！

我愛國，支持阻止西方邪惡勢力進入我中國境內，（尤其是美金）😄😄😄

过去一年大六消失的外汇资金估计系外国投资撤走时摞走的钱。

要銀両換口糧 所以疫情因口糧唔可以停

其实，老烧2015已经判断大六经济崩盘，之后大六每年增发20万亿，到2020已经增发100万亿，等于M2既一半，发晒颠。依家拖多几年至扑街，好正常遮！

Good, lock up all CCP in China! Close the gate, no more travelling to another country. The world will be a better place.

收紧护照为借口 阻止外汇外流 加上外國进口冻肉、海鮮沒有外汇付款 就说验帶有新冠病毒 土共借口多多🤭

草民送數月研究心血 蕭生 請大手買入股票 美團(03690) 3個月內升勢將持續 將有幾倍回報 賺錢吧~ 吾僅以至誠

多謝你的公義直播真實的報道。Sam

！

好搞笑，國內無論咩事結論都係中國最得益，呢到就咩事都係支爆。大家都係咁打飛機。

现在国内人想尽千方百计，想出去的理由是为施打国外的疫苗,，国产的疫苗是没人相信的。

幾乎中國人民家產都屬於共產黨，只可用此解釋為何人民不可把金錢帶走

贸易战的影响, 台资企业撤出大陆, 失业率升高, 怎么办? 台商不再爱中国 cnpost.info/down/dZ-Tk85rq83Rl7M/sh-p-n.html 3大原因　台商不再爱中国 www.cw.com.tw/article/5102878

請問河南省鄭州市可以辨嗎？

要走的，一早走曬（移咗民）啦！

中共護照不值錢送給人無人要。

蕭生走得走，中共內地封關，中共就快變成北韓。

人治國家!

48小时检疫报告

吾准人出去就系因为怕中国人出境怕卑外国医院检测到有武汉肺炎 。如果这事发生国内就无办法再报道零确诊。

代用卷可能重現..住酒店都可能要比美元啦..00

高端外wei🧍‍♀️，各大城市，k姐、模特……+薇。 zydlhqx

回到7..80年代又要走後門啦...哈哈

大陸用咗二，三仟億托實香港個聯滙，吾頂住一早冧咗，香港走咗好多錢。仲有呀爺日日使仟億去托港股，維持其集資功能。

我做嗰間公司,老闆滙利潤回香港母公司都困難重重,現今未攪到,以前好容易攪到的,還有廣州公司買唔到美元

好! 籠的傳人!

真係全國上至拍檯無禮嘅外交官下至鄉民都限制出國? 共匪終於知道無一國家唔知佢啲醜態! 噉有入咗外國籍啲共產黨員係唔係要全家退籍回國?

螞蟻🐜都死知乜嘢事啦

02:55 無緊急事故在槍口申請

好似隻貓頭鷹

萧生，點解人民币升值呢？

关于励志的个性签名:美丽的蓝图,落在懒汉手里,也不过是一页废纸。

每次聽完蕭生講嘢之後，最開心係等佢介紹啲嘢食

大陸快將成為北韓 2.0嗎？

班貪官早早將大部分黑錢洗到瑞士及世界各地！

仲有係防國民出外唱衰佢，唔係身有屎，怕咩人走

收緊出境，包括出境去香港嗎？

大陸封關？

澳門每日仲有幾億賭收

即有疫情驚比外人發現；又可能藉口不批准出國

鎖晒國, 但又起啲大到不得了嘅機場。佢都威到盡喇。

这个是啥新闻，全国各地出入境公众号都发布通知，暂停办理护照业务啊。。。又要加料自己的想法，你这么懂为什么不留香港选特首

GSA recognize new leader,done deal.

SHOULD WE COUNT ON THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF HONG KONG TO SAFEGUARD THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE IN HONG KONG? Please refer to the Google Groups (網路論壇) including "Lee Tai Building in Hong Kong" and "Lee Tai Building b" for details relating to the matters mentioned below, so that you can answer the question above. CONFIDENTIAL AND URGENT! 牛頭不對馬嘴! (牛頭唔搭馬嘴!) The Buildings Department has violated Article 64 of the Basic Law and subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 Buildings Ordinance etc.. Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, fail to execute their powers and duties as per Article 73 of the Basic Law. Please respond to my e-mails sent to you before the Legislative Councillors of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong leave the Legislative Council in December of 2020. From: **, an owner of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 太子道西101-107號利泰大樓業主 To: The Legislative Council of the HKSAR, the Public Complaints Office and all Legislative Council Members To: The Development Bureau of the HKSAR, The Buildings Department, The Fire Services Department, The Food and Health Bureau, FEHD) To: The Democratic Party of Hong Kong and WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Council Member Attn.: James TO Kun-sun, Mr. LAM Cheuk Ting and Mr. Chan, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan ............................. Dear All, Complaints about the Unauthorized Use of the Public/Common Areas at Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong by the Owner/Tenant of G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building [檔案編號：2-4933763902 (assigned by 1823)] [檔案編號：EP3/K03/RE/00034760-18 (assigned by EPD)] The case number assigned by The Ombudsman is OMB2019/1791. Complaints against the Buildings Department Complaints against Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun and Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong With respect to the content of the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, with reference no.: EB/5120/61/T02N, a copy of which is attached to this e-mail, my responses are as follows: It is reasonable for us to expect that the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong mentioned above is for responding to the relevant questions/issues in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department of Hong Kong. Clearly, the main focuses of the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from Mr. WU Chi-wai of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong to the Buildings Department mentioned above are the relevant aspects of subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 Buildings Ordinance of the Laws of Hong Kong, and therefore the Buildings Department of Hong Kong must respond to the questions/issues stated in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from Mr. WU Chi-wai of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong mentioned above specifically for the relevant aspects of subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong as per Article 64 of the Basic Law, which is as follows: www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html Article 64 of the Basic Law: The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must abide by the law and be accountable to the Legislative Council of the Region: ........ it shall answer questions raised by members of the Council; ......... As all people in Hong Kong must understand the Basic Law and the laws of Hong Kong etc., both the staff of the Buildings Department and the Legislative Council members must understand the Basic Law and the laws of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong ( www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001 ) and the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 Building Management Ordinance ( www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344 ) etc.. Clearly, for reasons mentioned in this email and/or mentioned before in my previous e-mails, the Buildings Department has been violating the laws of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong and Article 64 of the Basic Law etc.. .......... However, I would summarize my complaints against the Buildings Department as follows: 1. For reasons mentioned before and/or in this e-mail, the Buildings Department has been failing to execute its duties as per the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 123 including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 and/or other relevant sections/subsections of the Laws of Hong Kong, partly because the Buildings Department is not willing to check whether the owner of the G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building had obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building for converting the common parts of Lee Tai Building for its own use in the way mentioned in the e-mails/documents relating to the complaints stated above as per the literal interpretation of subsection no. 16(1)(d) of Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance. The Buildings Department must fully understand the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 Building Management Ordinance of the Laws of Hong Kong including section 18 and section 34I etc. of CAP 344 of the Laws of Hong Kong. If the staff of the Buildings Department do not fully understand such relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 of the Laws of Hong Kong, they would not be able to correctly identify and/or communicate with the wrongdoers relating to unauthorized buildings works. www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344?xpid=ID_1438403038456_002 2. The Buildings Department has failed to properly respond to my e-mails and/or the relevant correspondence from Mr. WU Chi-wai/the Democratic Party of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, ........ As I have expressed in my previous e-mails to you, the responses of the Buildings Department with respect to the captioned complaints are evasive, inadequate and misleading. The Buildings Department has not yet properly mentioned/stated anything with respect to the interpretation and/or execution of subsection no. 16(1)(d) of Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance and/or other relevant provisions of the laws of Hong Kong. 牛頭不對馬嘴! (牛頭唔搭馬嘴!) As such, the Buildings Department has not yet answered the questions in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department and the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) is meaningless. Therefore, the Buildings Department has violated Article 64 of the Basic Law. ................ However, I would summarize my complaints against the Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong including Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) etc. and/or the Democratic Party of Hong Kong as follows: a. For reasons mentioned before in my previous e-mails and/or in this e-mail, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) fail to execute their powers and duties as per Article 73 of the Basic Law in the ways mentioned in my previous e-mails ............... www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html Article 73 of the Basic Law is as follows: The Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall exercise the following powers and functions: ................................. ( 5 ) To raise questions on the work of the government; ( 6 ) To debate any issue concerning public interests; ................................... ( 8 ) To receive and handle complaints from Hong Kong residents; ............................................... ( 10 ) To summon, as required when exercising the above-mentioned powers and functions, persons concerned to testify or give evidence. Particularly, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) have failed to execute their powers and duties as per sections/subsections 5, 6, 8 and 10 etc. of Article 73 of the Basic Law, partly because they have not yet summoned 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) to testify or give evidence as per Article 73 of the Basic Law with respect to the complaints stated above and or before in my previous e-mails sent to you and ask 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) the following question(s): "Has 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building as per Cap 344 Building Management Ordinance for converting the relevant common parts of Lee Tai Building in the way mentioned before for its own use? If so, 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) is to provide all the relevant evidence(s) as per Article 73 of the Basic Law." Moreover, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) has been failing to compel/urge the Buildings Department to properly respond to my e-mails and/or......... I hereby urge you to execute your duties mentioned above and/or before properly and immediately .............. before the Legislative Councillors of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong leave the Legislative Council in December of 2020.

又系度灯，服左烧山...

your wife?

👍👍👍👍👍👍

共產黨收大 6 護照，但非常多人多年來用特衰身份証，申請回鄉咭。入到嚟特衰，調動外匯就易辦啦。

蕭生着西裝有型好多。

香港人快D走。重唔走想將來偷渡？游水去台灣？

所有牆國人終於鎖在牆國了😆

支爆來了🎉

资产买比特币最安全，边个都抢唔走！信我

做得好！ 「小丑」做既野簡直係無得頂！ 繼續加速下去！ 由外而內，自毁長城！ 天佑中華！ 天滅賊匪！

Bitcoin 升左咁條數有一大部份入左去。

來澳去香港算唔算出國？

關疫情鬼事，講到尾都係怕白銀外流

👍👍👍

大6O根本等江總舵主 byebye然後拉新四人幫落台. 經濟一团糟,外交一鍋泡,一路一派,派乾塘,外國通街敵人. 英國佬老謀深算,派伊利沙伯航母入南海,根本係新百國聯軍打進北平.

新移民又照批

👍👍💪💪💪

封關也是為了防止 人民 逃走 ，帶了證據好像阎丽萝一樣。

大陸一向對某 level 嘅政府人員沒收旅遊證件㗎。。。

GG, 包商銀行game over

😮

阿爺唔俾你走啊你走去邊呀?留低啲錢。仲想遊埠感嘆,,第2世啦!

好啊，這班大陸人到處不能去，還世界一個平靜

事實係攞美金 都仆晒街, 死吹無用, 事實人仔係咁升

走得去邊?歐美咁嚴重

長知識 thank you

感谢萧生分析。另外看到你介绍的小吃很有食欲，不知能否开发大陆市场？无毒又好味道的台湾产品，一定受欢迎

thank you for your support

百變有型

小狗熊要被召回啦.

大陸跨省都唔可以了

为咗疫情唔俾人出去，咁都有得黑，废青真废！

Cls

嚇官可以防腐，嚇民就会东躲西逃. 民是用來安撫的. 硬来可以封咀，卻最后要 用改革开放來救.

咁你去英國啦！

👍🏻

當然收緊政策典型愛國主義國家做法！不過,究竟中國真實實況香港（傳媒好少報衰嘢）真的不知道,至於大陸外匯存備減少,每月下跌情況是否嚴重？大家到唔道中國經常解釋話資產價格下降,不過,這個不重要而重點全面控制大局！

大陸愈封閉對世界愈好

我的出境理由是，我有很多人民幣，可給很多俾你駛。你批唔批。

夾一舊水就可以申請啦 都唔了解國情

中共軍演及探台把錢飛外，所以打台有局限。