(中字)林鄭叻過超人52%港人俾零分 周同學死因研訊新進展 戴啟思憂北京修改《基本法》DQ 法官〈蕭若元:蕭氏新聞台〉2020-11-27

  意见 177,261

memehongkong

个月 前

我開左Twitter和IG啦!想睇多d可以關注:Twitter: @hkStephenSYY / IG: hkStephenSYY
加入我們的patreon:www.patreon.com/mrshiu
你爆料我來講email: connectiontaiwan@gmail.com
謎米新聞:news.memehk.com
謎米香港: www.memehk.com
Facebook: memehkdotcom

评论
siumai Nie
siumai Nie 26 天 前
支持蕭若元!
Dee Tang
Dee Tang 个月 前
可以申請提早退休
shcestate1
shcestate1 个月 前
非常同意 长毛 係香港最偉大、最出格、最無私、最有料既議员!
敗燈投共作弊
敗燈投共作弊 个月 前
我要俾負分,負777分!🤬🤬🤬
shark0010899
shark0010899 个月 前
公務員達到45歲可以向政府申請我有性功能障礙申請提早退休
went chan
went chan 个月 前
Yesupup...up
Jacky Cheng
Jacky Cheng 个月 前
有能走快走
went chan
went chan 个月 前
Up...up..yes
went chan
went chan 个月 前
Yes....upup
went chan
went chan 个月 前
Yes...up
went chan
went chan 个月 前
Up...up
Hung Fai Li
Hung Fai Li 个月 前
Support this programme
Chris Tam
Chris Tam 个月 前
可否講下連千毅事件
kai
kai 个月 前
香港只有終審庭有公義,其他法院好難勝訴
LORI LAM
LORI LAM 个月 前
周梓樂單案不會有真相,所有出席的人全部證供就住講,不敢講真話。。。
Ho chili
Ho chili 个月 前
对負呢種人,要知道佢最心爱是什麼,要佢失去最心爱的東西。才会覺得痛,就算是撒旦都会有1样東西是最爱。以彼之道。還以彼身。
Siu Kam Cheung
Siu Kam Cheung 个月 前
小朋友的妈妈提早幾年退休, 會賺少一些退休金,但只要做滿十年和當年簽的係長俸约,應該可以提出辞職,其後等到退休年齡時,仍可领退休長俸的。
Mayble Ho
Mayble Ho 个月 前
香港學生 規定上內地交流 唔單止思想審查 其實會令到好多省份賺好多外匯 一舉兩得
moon WONG
moon WONG 个月 前
人渣中的人渣, 有中共國支持, 你吹得脹中共國咩.只願人走, 此生不再做中共國
Kenneth Cheung
Kenneth Cheung 个月 前
我一路聽周梓樂同學既過程,一路感到好壓抑及流淚
c yc
c yc 个月 前
當時根本是亂射催淚彈
Shan Gor
Shan Gor 个月 前
林奠落地獄。永不超生。
dyu sit
dyu sit 个月 前
零分,lum don’t 🤷🏻‍♂️
Hata San
Hata San 个月 前
不如調查下想佢死有幾多人
Colla Mok
Colla Mok 个月 前
但有個女人證人話自巳做抹車女工,每夜做到十一點幾,她說見到二個年青人,在三樓停車的圍欄跳下二樓,跟住又看見周同學跳落二樓,他告訴警方,等埋個女才走,迼位女證人自稱抺車女工,個女作供答得十分更好,請問一下的警方所以用書面作供嗎?的消房員是當晩的在場嗎?仲有從未見過香港證人不上庭,要提出足通份理由,照司法程序,四位是否犯左藐視法庭,妨礙司法公正,仲有是這個裁判官,成日阻止陪審員發問證人,記得得彥林開死囚庭時,他警告的證人,如果比俾假口功,㑹妨礙司法公正,他已經提醒的證人如果俾假口功,可以控告妨礙司法公正,希望周先生不要灰心,這個女工一定是俾假口功,在十二點周梓樂仲未去到三樓停車埸,她點知他是周同學呀?當夜連保安人都唔死左去邊呀?其實香港已經很少抹車工人,尢其是當夜,相信這位女工都食咗好多催淚彈煙,仲唔走,等收錢呀?一早巳經搵一架雙層巴士一架的士,三架警車,塞住咗手邊嘅馬路,所以有架私家車在夜上十一點左右,去停車埸泊車回家,但十分塞車,無意中車camp影到班大陸🐶従停車埸後門一班大陸防暴隊在十二點左右出來,他們將條片俾左傳媒,立即𨍭載,本來已經公開話沒有人上過停車埸,但有片看到,看到這位女警指揮官,已經知扑街,看到她雙眼通紅,第二次再出來知道周同學失救,如果死亡,當晚的🐶會控告謀殺,這個🐶女已經泣不成聲,另一消防高官都眼淚型腔連說話都不想講下去!由這西裝友在壓力下,會開死因庭!林鄭月娥同一哥揾左的證人最令氣憤,她不但比假口功,查到她二母女,如果比假口功,立即告她妨礙司法公正,當然搵唔番啦? 希望大家都可以令班殺人犯承認因為警方令周同學失救而死,為他沉寃得雪!其實已經講左比香港人知,有人俾假口功,有差人唔上庭,巳經証明周同學是他殺!仲有希望家人有兒子的電話同電䐉不要交給警方,先封存好!將來一定有用,通知電訊商可以拿到通話記錄,做個的虧心事,一定有提示!
Kwan Tony
Kwan Tony 个月 前
一定查到底,捉班殺人犯。
lee martin
lee martin 个月 前
777萬夫所指
dannyadog
dannyadog 个月 前
on9. 以後女方都不准長頭髮。咁就無岐視了。究竟係為咗大家好定on9行為
Kerry Ko
Kerry Ko 个月 前
林鄭成功糸歷史上成為第一個殺害香港人、協助放毒全世界既末代特首……
lee martin
lee martin 个月 前
黑警陪命
Sheley Yeung
Sheley Yeung 个月 前
去年睇蕭生至今,確實覺得蕭生這年憂愁多了。
Ryan Lee
Ryan Lee 个月 前
👍👍👍👍👍👍
Michael Yee
Michael Yee 个月 前
係呀!作為好出名的KOL,好多人會聽你地觀點而做決定。講真,呢個世界有幾多人有critical thinking?我自己就覺得大陸沒必會封關唔俾你走,因為佢地culture係任何人都可以俾取代。
t cwk
t cwk 个月 前
會否以后男女平等,攪到一齊都要剪架?
M記
M記 个月 前
幽默,很喜歡蒙眼的女神,直到天堂留了位。
po io
po io 个月 前
負零下七十一分,
Peggy HO
Peggy HO 个月 前
周梓樂同學, 香港之子
Ricky man
Ricky man 个月 前
香港失去周同學,實在心痛😭😭😭
Terry Tse
Terry Tse 个月 前
多謝蕭生幫長毛澄清
B K
B K 个月 前
長毛西利。
Minnie Deng
Minnie Deng 个月 前
当年如果留在大陆斗争的,最后都死光了!
Minnie Deng
Minnie Deng 个月 前
50年前很多大陆人逃到香港,如今,香港政治变成大陆,香港人聪明的也应该知道逃到外国啦!当年大陆人逃出来的时候,他们也没有钱,现在香港人最少也不致于当年大陆人那么穷吧!走为上着!快走啦!
suk yee chan
suk yee chan 个月 前
我剛剛吃午餐,點解封眼,隔離又有張柒相
tamkampo
tamkampo 个月 前
用另一個角度睇,蕭生睇法同預測,証明有正確一面。每個人都可以有不同思維,唔會只系聽蕭生一個講法就決定移民架?
Li Mark
Li Mark 个月 前
我唔明白民調點解冇負數!
Mathew Bear
Mathew Bear 个月 前
蕭先生,支持你👍
yman lee
yman lee 个月 前
黑警死全家
Li Mark
Li Mark 个月 前
多謝分析!
He Man
He Man 个月 前
可惜就算有疑點, 警謊都唔會查。
Ramas Choi
Ramas Choi 个月 前
若係 舊制度政府公務員 做夠 10年 可以申請 early retirement。 希望你果位讀者嘅家長入職時係舊制啦!
Joseph Kwok
Joseph Kwok 个月 前
Thanks info sharing
ching ching poon
ching ching poon 个月 前
林郑係陀衰習大大
xemex01
xemex01 个月 前
唉聲嘆氣都冇用, 一係忍, 一係走, 一係反
s Grul
s Grul 个月 前
公務員可以新請提早退休!
kk
kk 个月 前
最後嗰句最真實😂
charlie chung
charlie chung 个月 前
其實是比負分是正常一點,個嗅西是天敵中的人渣,佢死Q左還要俾人鞭屍。
Hinhin Tse
Hinhin Tse 个月 前
其實一個人條命要有幾硬先可以頂得住幾百萬人每日嘅沮咒,仲瞓到食到,果然只有人渣中嘅人渣先有咁嘅能耐😂😂
Eric Chow
Eric Chow 个月 前
個毒婦 feel 到大大錫佢就 hyper 過性高潮啦!
Dennis Wong
Dennis Wong 个月 前
HK gov wants to save money for CCP to use in mainland
leetai hk
leetai hk 个月 前
Why you you?! 有人建議香港特首林鄭月娥、陳智思, 香港警務處處長鄧炳強、前警務處長盧偉聰、香港保安局長李家超、香港律政司司長鄭若驊、政制及內地事務局局長曾國衞及陳國基去中國銀行/大陸大量購買黃金及鑽石放在屋企; 哇! 咁就金鑽滿屋威威啦,Ha Haa …… 並且在中國大陸大量購買物業/住宅單位,全力支持我們偉大祖國的物業/房地產市場,而自己就有更多方便自己的居住空間; 靜雞雞去買就得喇; 有咁多私密住家,做乜都得啦,你明白的,心照啦! 呵呵 ....... 使乜等;即刻買;遲啲買就要買貴貨喇,因為很多香港政府官員都爭住買呀!................... 勁興奮, 開心晒 ........ Why you you?!
leetai hk
leetai hk 个月 前
SHOULD WE COUNT ON THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF HONG KONG TO SAFEGUARD THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE IN HONG KONG? Please refer to the Google Groups (網路論壇) including "Lee Tai Building in Hong Kong" and "Lee Tai Building b" for details relating to the matters mentioned below, so that you can answer the question above. CONFIDENTIAL AND URGENT! 牛頭不對馬嘴! (牛頭唔搭馬嘴!) The Buildings Department has violated Article 64 of the Basic Law and subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 Buildings Ordinance etc.. Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, fail to execute their powers and duties as per Article 73 of the Basic Law. Please respond to my e-mails sent to you before the Legislative Councillors of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong leave the Legislative Council in December of 2020. From: **, an owner of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 太子道西101-107號利泰大樓業主 To: The Legislative Council of the HKSAR, the Public Complaints Office and all Legislative Council Members To: The Development Bureau of the HKSAR, The Buildings Department, The Fire Services Department, The Food and Health Bureau, FEHD) To: The Democratic Party of Hong Kong and WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Council Member Attn.: James TO Kun-sun, Mr. LAM Cheuk Ting and Mr. Chan, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan ............................. Dear All, Complaints about the Unauthorized Use of the Public/Common Areas at Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong by the Owner/Tenant of G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building [檔案編號:2-4933763902 (assigned by 1823)] [檔案編號:EP3/K03/RE/00034760-18 (assigned by EPD)] The case number assigned by The Ombudsman is OMB2019/1791. Complaints against the Buildings Department Complaints against Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun and Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong With respect to the content of the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, with reference no.: EB/5120/61/T02N, a copy of which is attached to this e-mail, my responses are as follows: It is reasonable for us to expect that the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong mentioned above is for responding to the relevant questions/issues in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department of Hong Kong. Clearly, the main focuses of the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from Mr. WU Chi-wai of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong to the Buildings Department mentioned above are the relevant aspects of subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 Buildings Ordinance of the Laws of Hong Kong, and therefore the Buildings Department of Hong Kong must respond to the questions/issues stated in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from Mr. WU Chi-wai of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong mentioned above specifically for the relevant aspects of subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong as per Article 64 of the Basic Law, which is as follows: www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html Article 64 of the Basic Law: The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must abide by the law and be accountable to the Legislative Council of the Region: ........ it shall answer questions raised by members of the Council; ......... As all people in Hong Kong must understand the Basic Law and the laws of Hong Kong etc., both the staff of the Buildings Department and the Legislative Council members must understand the Basic Law and the laws of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong ( www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001 ) and the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 Building Management Ordinance ( www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344 ) etc.. Clearly, for reasons mentioned in this email and/or mentioned before in my previous e-mails, the Buildings Department has been violating the laws of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong and Article 64 of the Basic Law etc.. .......... However, I would summarize my complaints against the Buildings Department as follows: 1. For reasons mentioned before and/or in this e-mail, the Buildings Department has been failing to execute its duties as per the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 123 including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 and/or other relevant sections/subsections of the Laws of Hong Kong, partly because the Buildings Department is not willing to check whether the owner of the G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building had obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building for converting the common parts of Lee Tai Building for its own use in the way mentioned in the e-mails/documents relating to the complaints stated above as per the literal interpretation of subsection no. 16(1)(d) of Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance. The Buildings Department must fully understand the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 Building Management Ordinance of the Laws of Hong Kong including section 18 and section 34I etc. of CAP 344 of the Laws of Hong Kong. If the staff of the Buildings Department do not fully understand such relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 of the Laws of Hong Kong, they would not be able to correctly identify and/or communicate with the wrongdoers relating to unauthorized buildings works. www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344?xpid=ID_1438403038456_002 2. The Buildings Department has failed to properly respond to my e-mails and/or the relevant correspondence from Mr. WU Chi-wai/the Democratic Party of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, ........ As I have expressed in my previous e-mails to you, the responses of the Buildings Department with respect to the captioned complaints are evasive, inadequate and misleading. The Buildings Department has not yet properly mentioned/stated anything with respect to the interpretation and/or execution of subsection no. 16(1)(d) of Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance and/or other relevant provisions of the laws of Hong Kong. 牛頭不對馬嘴! (牛頭唔搭馬嘴!) As such, the Buildings Department has not yet answered the questions in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department and the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) is meaningless. Therefore, the Buildings Department has violated Article 64 of the Basic Law. ................ However, I would summarize my complaints against the Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong including Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) etc. and/or the Democratic Party of Hong Kong as follows: a. For reasons mentioned before in my previous e-mails and/or in this e-mail, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) fail to execute their powers and duties as per Article 73 of the Basic Law in the ways mentioned in my previous e-mails ............... www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html Article 73 of the Basic Law is as follows: The Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall exercise the following powers and functions: ................................. ( 5 ) To raise questions on the work of the government; ( 6 ) To debate any issue concerning public interests; ................................... ( 8 ) To receive and handle complaints from Hong Kong residents; ............................................... ( 10 ) To summon, as required when exercising the above-mentioned powers and functions, persons concerned to testify or give evidence. Particularly, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) have failed to execute their powers and duties as per sections/subsections 5, 6, 8 and 10 etc. of Article 73 of the Basic Law, partly because they have not yet summoned 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) to testify or give evidence as per Article 73 of the Basic Law with respect to the complaints stated above and or before in my previous e-mails sent to you and ask 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) the following question(s): "Has 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building as per Cap 344 Building Management Ordinance for converting the relevant common parts of Lee Tai Building in the way mentioned before for its own use? If so, 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) is to provide all the relevant evidence(s) as per Article 73 of the Basic Law." Moreover, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) has been failing to compel/urge the Buildings Department to properly respond to my e-mails and/or......... I hereby urge you to execute your duties mentioned above and/or before properly and immediately .............. before the Legislative Councillors of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong leave the Legislative Council in December of 2020.
AAA 1681668
AAA 1681668 个月 前
廢7速速死開!
kwok chuen lam
kwok chuen lam 个月 前
she Carrier Lam is held in contempt, but she's seem never know.
Elaine Choi
Elaine Choi 个月 前
好中意聽蕭生鬧個冚家剷
頭暗光7
頭暗光7 个月 前
返大6考察系好事,要鸡有鸡,要鸭有鸭,保证平过香港。
ron lin
ron lin 个月 前
蕭生,公務員退休長糧都不要,出事損失誰負責??
Tak kee Wong
Tak kee Wong 个月 前
千夫所指 無疾而終
Ahsau Wan
Ahsau Wan 个月 前
沒想到從七月到現在,香港已天翻地復.....
Roger Au
Roger Au 个月 前
通識科變通過政治科, 一係過一係唔過
狐小
狐小 个月 前
無法無天無盡黑暗!等天收
Kibin Yin
Kibin Yin 个月 前
如果是香港公务员就别走了。走是对于普通人比较有用而已。
Elizabeth Lau
Elizabeth Lau 个月 前
Yes.............We need to know the truth, nothing but the truth..............Everything is hushed up with a corrupted & closed government..........We must stand firm against it.
David Wong
David Wong 个月 前
我廢老中學時當然冇讀過通識科,只有中史.Google香港通識科,頭幾條都冇其詳細背景,只說2009起為必修科,或略提為董建華目光遠大的政策之一.我覺得老董眼高手底,最慘冇自知之明,又用人不善…等.如689為父,那老董就是祖父了,功不可沒!
rockerfromhk
rockerfromhk 个月 前
Mr Long Hair is so respectable, salute
Tube You
Tube You 个月 前
📌對。長毛係講得出,就自己去做。唔似熱、普、城、白兵係煽動啲拎仔去衝,攪破壞,通共匪。 ------- 敬請網友訂閱「香港花生」。長毛、曹總主持嘅「毛神論」。 📌香港敢言嘅網台。
先生憨豆
先生憨豆 个月 前
香港经济已经差的不得了了。现在已经没有国际金融中心的地位了。你以为中国还会手软嘛?反正都没有了,还不干死你。香港人跑的就跑吧,不要留在那里。
黃色熊
黃色熊 个月 前
封一邊唔封一邊你指封關❓
PETER LAM
PETER LAM 个月 前
如果有那么多人不喜欢林郑,为什么没有人刺杀她?所以结论是没有人不喜欢她。
MR. POPO
MR. POPO 个月 前
of coz, blue silk only knows how to blam.
lam cheuk
lam cheuk 个月 前
淋病毒娥遺臭萬年。
MR. POPO
MR. POPO 个月 前
#Hug
香港人加油香港加油
香港人加油香港加油 个月 前
淋病用人渣來形容佢都唔合適,應該叫佢畜牲,
Cross Circle
Cross Circle 个月 前
Chinese overseas, ABC, CBC, BBC are very selfish especially the Hong Kong civilians (returnees) from UK, they only care for money.
dick lau
dick lau 个月 前
真的嗎?
Vivian Huang
Vivian Huang 个月 前
👍👍👍👍
連 儂 牆 -連 儂 牆
連 儂 牆 -連 儂 牆 个月 前
特朗普領先... 最新重點票結果 11月15日 特朗普 232 票 ,拜登 227 票。堅持消滅共產黨 ... 十 一 開戰中,中共操政媒,拜共盗政變,華爾街變政,主媒陷投共, 支持合法特;全球齊減共 ,打倒教宗共 。😈共匪亡 中國興 😇 cnpost.info/down/dXusrbF0oJe_mqc/sh-p-n.html //關係全香港人既重要(你有需要睇哂) 這晚開始全個Facebook 都係洗版式既開香檳慶祝post,但就好似完全無人/無page講 「港康碼」 港康碼即係之前提過既健康碼,正如之前所講既一樣,政府會係兩個星期後落實,為係香港市民做DNA檢疫(非強制),之後會為已做檢疫既市民發出一個二維碼以分別健康情況// -網友 --------------------- 首先,抽DNA同而家防疫係完全零關係,零幫助,零作用,只為偷取大家既DNA。 第二,兩星期後,愛國愛黨同一大班藍絲就會去做檢疫,好可能有一班黃絲/中立人士都會不知情咁做左,當已檢疫人士達到一定數目,政府就會對持有健康碼既人士放寬防疫守則,健康碼顯示健康既人士可以自由進出食肆、唔洗限聚等等等等。 第三,當大家而家已經習慣去唔同地方都要比人用槍嘟頭既時候,遲下就唔係嘟頭而係出示健康碼,慢慢會有更多人唔係迫唔洗強制既情況下都會去做DNA檢疫,為既都係方便同埋覺得佢拎你DNA無乜大不了 (用於日後活摘...???) 第四,當健康碼普遍實行之後,政府會推出更加相應措施同設備去限制及監管大家,例如係交通工具,食肆,商場,公共設施,隧道或出入境 加裝健康碼掃描器,到時佢依然唔會強制逼你做檢疫,因為只要你無健康碼,就同禁足無分別,而且你去邊都要掃健康碼,佢間接對大家既行蹤一清二楚 第五,而家政府做任何野,相信大家都唔會相信,咁健康碼到底要點先證明你係健康呢? 大概就係分 著綠燈就健康,紅燈就唔健康 咁上下喇,即係大家健唔健康(有無得出門)都掌握係政府手,咁大家覺得佢會唔會用呢個方法間接管控大家,執行一切政治任務?例如社會肅清,監控輿論。只要大家講咩光復香港,五大訴求,香港獨立之類既說話,你或者你既屋企人既健康碼就有可能無端端由綠色變紅色,久而久之,大家就會知道講咩會變紅色,被禁足禁自由,慢慢社會上就再唔會有反政府聲音出現! 可能你覺得好on9,諗到咁極端,sorry,事實就係咁,呢一套社會信用系統,健康碼,已經係中國大陸實行緊,而上面講既,亦都係活生生既例子。// #手動轉 勇敢國民棄共黨 人權自由生永享 4 9 建國 7 1 滅 國際覺醒中共亡 做個勇敢中國人,堅持滅犯罪集團;做個勇敢中國人,堅持絕非法組織;做個勇敢中國人,堅持打倒共產黨;做個勇敢中國人,世代民主活自由。國際支援,機會不再;白黑珍惜,天佑香港...............
g
g 个月 前
心痛……哭S我……
Aman Mang
Aman Mang 个月 前
林郑有一千个夫?
C T
C T 个月 前
光復香港 時代革命 全民起義 還政於民 驅逐共黨 香港獨立
C T
C T 个月 前
Destroy ccp for harming US president and the world
Aman Mang
Aman Mang 个月 前
唔俾走,把鬼咩!
Yan Yan
Yan Yan 个月 前
千古罪人含家產林鄭 點會派錢啦
Sam Beb
Sam Beb 个月 前
老早已經知道要嚴打法官,一定好多法官被換取
Faust T.L. Siu
Faust T.L. Siu 个月 前
佢老公同埋個仔唔係人渣? 會唔會天真左呢?理解下乜野叫近朱者赤吧。
Tube You
Tube You 个月 前
📌佢兩個仔係喺第一世界國家讀書㗎,無社會責任,做BYSTANDERS,就係最好返大鴉灣永留,真係光宗耀祖。 📌對。長毛係講得出,就自己去做。唔似熱、普、城、白兵係煽動啲拎仔去衝,攪破壞,通共匪。 ------- 敬請網友訂閱「香港花生」。長毛、曹總主持嘅「毛神論」。 📌香港敢言嘅網台。
ACHエーオン
ACHエーオン 个月 前
臭坑出臭草,係好嘅早就大義滅親,仲成日匿埋係佢後便出計就真,四人幫你都唔識
Yan Yan
Yan Yan 个月 前
監獄可以投票未必係一件好事 如果可以投票我相信一定係畀 操控
sandy chung
sandy chung 个月 前
蕭生, 又好難怪小朋友 爸媽的想法要盡早移民. 因為我聽咗你啲片關於明年限制出境, 真係嚇咗一驚😱. 連我日籍先生及澳洲籍的我都有啲consider離開.
Chongshek Koo
Chongshek Koo 个月 前
想問想講:死過個糸佢地家人子女,佢地有么感受!!!
eddie tran
eddie tran 个月 前
thank you for your support
man Woya
man Woya 个月 前
香港中邪
somboon cheung
somboon cheung 个月 前
香港考試,無論乜試題,只要答习近平万岁就羅滿分!
k chan
k chan 个月 前
林門不幸。
We’re Married! by Alex Gonzaga
11:18
Alex Gonzaga Official
意见 7M
鏗鏘集:失業潮
23:08
RTHK 香港電台
意见 371K
首席執行官與你面對面:施永青
52:08
RTHK 香港電台
意见 127K
We’re Married! by Alex Gonzaga
11:18
Alex Gonzaga Official
意见 7M
星期日檔案 - 年輕媽媽的人生有什麼改變?
21:48
無綫新聞 TVB NEWS official
意见 53K
We’re Married! by Alex Gonzaga
11:18
Alex Gonzaga Official
意见 7M